This Christian Journey:
Why I Disagree With All 5 Points of Calvinism
by Dr. Curtis Hutson
term "Calvinism" is loosely used by some people who do not hold Calvin's
teaching on predestination and do not understand exactly what Calvin taught.
Dr. Loraine Boettner in his book,
"The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination" says,
"The Calvinistic system especially
emphasizes five distinct doctrines. These are technically known as "The Five
Points of Calvinism". And they are the main pillars upon which the
Dr. Boettner further says,
points may be more easily remembered if they are associated with the word
T-U-L-I-P , T, Total Inability; U, Unconditional Election; L, Limited
Atonement; I, Irresistible (efficacious) Grace;
and P, Perseverance of the Saints."
These are the points of Calvinism.
I have heard preachers say, "I am a one-point Calvinist."
I have heard others say, "I am a two- or three-point
I want us to look at all five points of Calvinism as
taught by John Calvin, then see what the Bible has to say on each point.
By total inability Calvin meant
that a lost sinner cannot come to Jesus Christ and trust Him as Saviour,
unless he is foreordained to come to Christ. By total inability he meant
that no man has the ability to come to Christ. And unless God overpowers him
and gives him that ability, he will never come to Christ
The Bible teaches total depravity, and I believe in total
depravity. But that simply means that there is nothing good in man to earn
or deserve salvation. The Bible says in Jeremiah 17:9, "The heart is
deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked."
A preacher brought a wonderful sermon on the depravity of
the human heart. And when he finished his message, someone came to him and
said," I want you to know I can't swallow that depraved heart that you
The preacher smiled and said, "You don't have to swallow
it. It's already in you!"
While the Bible teaches the depravity of the human race,
it nowhere teaches total inability. The Bible never hints that people are
lost because they have no ability to come to Christ. The language of Jesus
was, "Ye will not come to me, that ye might have life" (John 5:40).
Notice, it is not a matter of whether or not you can come
to Christ; it is a matter of whether or not you will come to Christ.
Jesus looked over Jerusalem and
wept and said, "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem . . .how often would I have gathered
thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings,
and ye would not!" (Matt. 23:37). Here again notice, He did not say, "How
often would I have gathered you together, but you could not." No. He said,
"Ye would not!" It was not a matter of whether they could; it was a matter
of whether they would.
Revelation 22:17, the last
invitation in the Bible, says, "And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And
let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And
whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely ."
If it is true that no person has the ability to come to
Christ, then why would Jesus say in John 5:40, "Ye will not come to me." why
didn't He simply say, "You cannot come to me."?
The only thing that stands between
the sinner and salvation is the sinner's will. God made every man a free
moral agent. And God never burglarises the human will.
D. L. Moody addressed a large group
of sceptics. He said ,"I want to talk about the word believe, the word
receive, and the word take." When Mr. Moody had finished his sermon, he
asked, "Now who will come and take Christ as Saviour?"
One man stood and said, "I can't."
Mr. Moody wept and said, "Don't say, 'I can't.' Say, 'I
And the man said, "Then, I won't!"
But another man said, "I will!"
Then another said, "I will!" And another said , "I will!" Until scores came
to trust Christ as Saviour.
Some Calvinists use John 6:44 in an effort to prove total
inability. Here the Bible says, "No man can come to me except the Father
which hath sent me draw him...."But the Bible makes it plain in John 12:32
that Christ will draw all men unto Himself. Here the Bible says, "And I, if
I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me."
All men are drawn to Christ, but
not all men will trust Christ as Saviour. Every man will make his own
decision to trust Christ or to reject Him. The Bible makes it clear that all
men have light. John 1:9 says, "That was the true Light, which lighteth
every man that cometh into the world." Romans 1:19,20 indicates that every
sinner has been called through the creation about him. And Romans 2:11-16
indicates that sinners are called through their conscience, even when they
have not heard the Word of God.
So in the final analysis, men go to Hell, not because of
their inability to come to Christ, but because they will not come to
Christ-"Ye will not come to me, that ye might have life."
The teaching that men, women and
children are totally unable to come to Christ and trust Him as Saviour is
not a scriptural doctrine. The language itself is not scriptural.
II. Unconditional Election
By unconditional election Calvin meant that some are
elected to Heaven, while others are elected to Hell, and that this election
is unconditional. It is wholly on God's part and without condition. By
unconditional election Calvin meant that God has already decided who will be
saved and who will be lost, and the individual has absolutely nothing to do
with it. He can only hope that God has elected him for Heaven and not for
This teaching so obviously disagrees with the
oft-repeated invitations in the Bible to sinners to come to Christ and be
saved that some readers will think that I have overstated the doctrine. So I
will quote John Calvin in his "Institutes," Book III, chapter 23,
"....Not all men are created with similar destiny but
eternal life is foreordained for some , and eternal damnation for others.
Every man, therefore, being created for one or the other of these ends, we
say, he is predestined either to life or to death."
So Calvinism teaches that it is God's own choice that
some people are to be damned forever. He never intended to save them. He
foreordained them to go to Hell. And when He offers salvation in the Bible,
He does not offer it to those who were foreordained to be damned. It is
offered only to those who were foreordained to be saved.
This teaching insists that we need not try to win men to
Christ because men cannot be saved unless God has planned for them to be
saved. And if God has planned for them to be eternally lost, they will not
come to Christ.
There is the Bible doctrine of
God's foreknowledge, predestination and election. Most knowledgeable
Christians agree that God has His controlling hand on the affairs of men.
They agree that according to the Bible, He selects individuals like Abraham,
Isaac, Jacob, and David as instruments to do certain things He has planned.
Most Christians agree that God may choose a nation-particularly that He did
choose Israel, through which He gave the law, the prophets, and eventually
through whom the Saviour Himself would come- and that there is a Bible
doctrine that God foreknows all things.
I have often said, "Did it ever
occur to you that nothing ever occurred to God?". God in His foreknowledge
knows who will trust Jesus Christ as Saviour, and He has predestined to see
that they are justified and glorified. He will keep all those who trust Him
and see that they are glorified. But the doctrine that God elected some men
to Hell, that they were born to be damned by God's own choice, is a radical
heresy not taught anywhere in the Bible.
I have in my hand a booklet
entitled TULIP written by Vic Lockman. In the booklet Mr. Lockman attempts
to prove the five points of Calvinism. Under the point, Unconditional
Election, he quotes Ephesians 1:4, but he only quotes the first part of the
verse: "He hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world. "
However, that is not the end of the verse. Mr. Lockman, like most
Calvinists, stopped in the middle of the verse. The entire verse reads:
"According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world,
that we should be holy and without blame before him in love." The verse says
nothing about being chosen for Heaven or Hell. It says we are chosen that we
should be holy and without blame before him in love
Under the same point, Unconditional
Election, Mr. Lockman quotes John 15:16, "Ye have not chosen me, but I have
chosen you." Again, Mr. Lockman, like most Calvinists, stops in the middle
of the verse. The entire verse reads: "Ye have not chosen me, but I have
chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and
that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in
my name, he may give it you."
The verse says nothing about being
chosen for Heaven or Hell. It says we are chosen to go and bring forth
fruit, which simply means that every Christian is chosen to be a soul
winner. The fruit of a Christian is other Christians. Proverbs 11:30 says,
"The fruit of the righteous is a tree of life; and he that winneth souls is
Nowhere does the Bible teach that God wills for some to
go to Heaven and wills others to go to Hell. No. The Bible teaches that God
would have all men to be saved. Second Peter 3:9 says that He is "not
willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."
First Timothy 2:4 says, "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto
the knowledge of the truth."
Those who teach that God would only have some to be
saved, while He would have others to be lost are misrepresenting God and the
Does God really predestinate some
people to be saved and predestinate others to go to Hell, so that they have
no free choice? Absolutely not! Nobody is predestined to be saved, except as
he chooses of his own free will to come to Christ and trust Him for
salvation. And no one is predestined to go to Hell, except as he chooses of
his own free will to reject Christ and refuses to trust Him as Saviour. John
3:36 says, "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that
believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on
Nothing could be plainer. The man
who goes to Heaven goes because he comes to Jesus Christ and trusts Him as
Saviour. And the man who goes to Hell does so because he refuses to come to
Jesus Christ and will not trust Him as Saviour.
III. Limited Atonement
By limited atonement, Calvin meant that Christ died only
for the elect, for those He planned and ordained to go to Heaven: He did not
die for those He planned and ordained to go to Hell. Again I say, such
language is not in the Bible , and the doctrine wholly contradicts many,
many plain Scriptures.
For instance, the Bible says in I
John 2:2, "He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for our's only, but
also for the sins of the whole world ." The teaching of Calvinism on Limited
Atonement contradicts the express statement of Scripture. First Timothy
2:5,6 says, " The man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all...."
The Bible teaches that Jesus is the
Saviour of the world. John 4:42 says, "And said unto the woman, Now we
believe , not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and
know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world." Again I John
4:14, "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be
the Saviour of the world." The Scriptures make it plain that Jesus came to
save the world. John 3:17 says, " For God sent not his Son into the world to
condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved."
No man will ever look at Jesus
Christ and say, "You didn't want to be my Saviour ." No! No! Jesus wants to
be the Saviour of all men. As a matter of fact, I Timothy 4:10 says, "For
therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living
God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe."
The Bible teaches that Christ bore the sins of all
people. Isaiah 53:6 says, "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have
turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity
of us all." There are twos "alls" in this verse. The first "all" speaks of
the universal fact of sin- "All we like sheep have gone astray." And the
second "all" speaks of universal atonement-"and the Lord hath laid on him
the iniquity of us all." The "all" in the first part of Isaiah 53:6 covers.
If all went astray, then the iniquities of all were laid on Christ.
Not only did He bear the sins of us
all, but the Bible plainly teaches that He died for the whole world.Look at
John 2:2: "And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only,
but for the sins of the whole world." If that isn't plain enough, the Bible
says His death was for every man; "But we see Jesus, who was made a little
lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and
honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man" (Heb.
Nothing could be plainer than the fact that Jesus Christ
died for every man. First timothy 2:5,6 says, "For there is one God, and one
mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a
ransom for all. . . . " Romans 8:32 states, "He that spared not his own Son,
but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give
us all things?"
Look at the statements--statement after statement: "that
he by the grace of God should taste death for every man"; "Who gave himself
a ransom for all"; "delivered him up for us all."
John 3:16 has often been called "the heart of the Bible."
It has been called "the Bible in miniature." "For God so loved the world,
that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should
not perish, but have everlasting life." Jesus died for the whole world. He
suffered Hell for every man who has ever lived or ever will live. And no man
will look out of Hell and say, "I wanted to be saved, but Jesus did not die
Some argue that if Jesus died for the whole world, the
whole world would be saved. No. the death of Jesus Christ on the cross was
sufficient for all, but it is efficient only to those who believe. The death
of Jesus Christ on the cross made it possible for every man everywhere to be
saved. But only those who believe that He died to pay their sin debt and who
trust Him completely for salvation will be saved.
Again I quote John 3:36, "He that
believeth on the Son hath everlasting life. . . ." Everybody is potentially
saved, but everybody is not actually saved until he recognises that he is a
sinner, believes that Jesus Christ died on the cross to pay the sin debt,
and trust Him completely for salvation.
The atonement is not limited. it is as universal as sin.
Romans 5:20 says, "But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound."
Isaiah 53:6 states, "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned
every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us
A famous English preacher spoke in an English town, then
rushed to catch his train for London. A sinner who heard him preach felt
that he must immediately settle the matter of salvation. So he followed the
preacher to the train. Just as the train pulled into the station, he took
hold of the preacher's lapel and said, " I want to be saved! Tell me how!"
The minister said, "I must catch this last rain to
London. Do you have a Bible?"
"Yes, I have one at home," said the anxious inquirer.
"Then go home and find Isaiah 53:6. Read it carefully. Go
in at the first all, and come out at the last all, and you will be saved."
The preacher rushed away, and the anxious sinner was left
alone. He went back to his home, and opening his Bible, he turned to Isaiah
53:6. What did the preacher mean, he wondered--"Go in at the first all and
come out at the last all, and you will be saved"? He found the verse and
read it carefully: "All we like sheep have gone astray."
Well, he thought to himself, I can certainly go in at the
first all. I have gone astray. I am a poor, lost sinner. The he read the
last part of the verse, "And the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us
all." He said to himself, "If I come out at the last all, I must believe
that all my sins were laid on Christ, that He took my place and paid for my
sins. And if I rely upon that, I will be saved. That's what the preacher
He then trusted Christ and was
saved. He believed that he was a sinner, and that all his sins had been laid
IV. Irresistible Grace
The fourth point of Calvinism is irresistible grace. By
irresistible grace, John Calvin meant that God simply forces people to be
saved. God elected some to be saved, and he let Jesus Christ die for that
elect group. And now by irresistible grace, He forces those He elected, and
those Jesus Christ died for to be saved.
The truth of the matter is, there is no such thing as
irresistible grace. Nowhere in the Bible does the word "irresistible" appear
before the word "grace". That terminology is simply not in the Bible. It is
the philosophy of John Calvin, not a Bible doctrine. The word "irresistible"
doesn't even sound right in front of the word "grace."
Grace means "God's unmerited favour."
Somebody said G-R-A-C-E- God's riches at Christ's expense. Grace is an
attitude, not a power. If Calvin had talked about the irresistible drawing
power of God, it would have made more sense. But instead, he represents
grace as the irresistible act of God compelling a man to be saved who does
not want to be saved, so that a man has no choice in the matter at all,
except as God forcibly puts a choice in his mind. Calvinism teaches that man
has no part in salvation, and cannot possibly co-operate with God in the
matter. In no sense of the word and at no stage of the work does salvation
depend upon the will or work of man or wait for the determination of his
Does the Bible say anything about
irresistible grace? Absolutely not! The Scriptures show that men do resist
and reject God. Proverbs 29:1 states, "He, that being often reproved
hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy."
Notice the word "often" in this verse. If God only gave one opportunity to
be saved, then man could not complain. But here the Bible says, "He, that
being often reproved.. . " This means the man was reproved over and over
again. Not only was he reproved many times, but he was reproved often. But
the Bible says he "hardeneth his neck" and "shall suddenly be destroyed, and
that without remedy." That certainly doesn't sound like irresistible grace.
The Bible teaches that a man can be reproved over and over again, and that
he can harden his neck against God, and as a result will be destroyed
Again Proverbs 1:24-26 says,
"Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no
man regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my
reproof: I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear
Here the Bible plainly says, "I
have called, and ye have refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man
regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my
reproof." That doesn't sound like irresistible grace. God calls, and men
refuse. Is that irresistible? God stretches out his hand and no man regards
it? Is that irresistible grace? No. The Bible makes it plain that some men
do reject Christ, that they refuse His call. John 5:40 says, "Ye will not
come to me, that ye may have life." That verse plainly teaches that men can
and do resist God and refuse to come to Him.
In Acts chapter 7, we find Stephen preaching. He says in
verse 51, "Ye stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always
resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye." To these Jewish
leaders, Stephen said, "Ye do always resist the Holy Ghost."
So here were people; some of whom had seen Jesus and
heard Him preach; others who had heard Peter at Pentecost; others who had
heard Stephen and other Spirit-filled men preaching with great power. And
what had they done? They were stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and
ears. That is ,they were stubborn and rebellious against God. The Bible
plainly says, "They resisted the Holy Ghost."
Notice the words of Stephen in verse 51, "Ye do always
resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye." Here the Bible
teaches that not only were these Jewish leaders resisting the Holy Ghost,
but that their fathers before them had also resisted the Holy Spirit.
Stephen says that all the way from Abraham, through the history of the
Jewish nation, down to the time of Christ, unconverted Jews had resisted the
There is absolutely no such thing as a
"can't-help-it-religion." God doesn't just force men to be saved with His
so-called irresistible grace.
God offers salvation to all men.
Titus 1:11 says, "For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared
to all men." But man must make his own choice. He must either receive or
reject Christ . John 1:12 says. "But as many as received him , to them gave
he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name."
When Jesus wept over Jerusalem, he
said, "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest
them which are sent unto thee, ho often would I have gathered thy children
together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would
not!" Here again the Bible clearly indicates that God would have gathered
them together as a hen gathers her chickens, but they would not. That
certainly shows that they could reject and resist Christ.
"I would, but ye would not" does not fit the teaching of
irresistible grace. So people do resist the Holy Ghost. They do refuse to
come to Christ. They do harden their necks. They do refuse when God calls.
That means that those who are not
saved could have been saved. Those who have rejected Christ could have
accepted Him. God offers salvation to those who will have it, but does not
enforce it upon anyone who doesn't want it.
V. Perseverance of the Saints
The Bible teaches, and I believe in, the eternal security
of the born-again believer. The man who has trusted Jesus Christ has
everlasting life and will never perish. But the eternal security of the
believer does not depend on his perseverance.
I do not know a single Bible verse that says anything
about the saints' persevering, but there are several Bible verses that
mention the fact that the saints have been preserved. Perseverance is one
thing. Preservation is another. No. The saints do not persevere; they are
The Bible states in Jude 1. "Jude, the servant of Jesus
Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father,
and preserved in Jesus Christ..." First Thessalonians 5:23 says, "And the
very God of peace sanctify you wholly: and I pray God your whole spirit and
soul, and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus
The other morning I opened a jar of peach preserves. I
don't know how long those peaches have been in that jar. But the jar had
been sealed some time ago, and the peaches were preserved. When I took out
the preserves and ate them with a good hot biscuit, they were as good as
they were the day they were placed in the jar.
But wait a minute! The peaches had nothing to do with it.
They were not fresh and good because they had persevered. They were good and
fresh because they had been preserved.
The Bible makes it plain that the believer is kept. He
does not keep himself. First Peter 1:4,5 states:
"To an inheritance
incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in
heaven for you, Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto
salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."
The Bible says in John 10:27-29:
"My sheep hear my voice, and I know them and they
follow me: And I give unto them eternal life: and they shall never
perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father,
which gave them me, is greater than all, and no man is able to pluck
them out of my Fathers hand."
Now that doesn't sound like perseverance of the sheep or
the saints. Here the sheep are in the Fathers hand, and they are safe-not
because they persevere, but because they are in the Fathers hand.
Charles Spurgeon once said, "I do
not believe in the perseverance of the Saviour."
To be sure, the Bible teaches the eternal security of the
believer. But the believer's security has nothing to do with his
persevering. We are secure because we are kept by God. We are held in the
Father's hand. And according to Ephesians 4:30, we have been sealed by the
Holy Spirit until the day of redemption.
So I disagree with all five points of Calvinism as John
Calvin taught it.
There is a belief that if one does
not teach universal salvation, he must either be a Calvinist or an Arminian.
In this book, The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, Dr. Loraine
Boettner says on page 47,
"There are really only three
systems which claim to set forth the way of salvation through Christ
[And he names them]:
"(1) Universalism, that all will be saved. (2)
Arminianism, which holds that Christ died equally and indiscriminately
for every individual......., that saying grace is not necessarily
permanent, but that those who are loved of God, ransomed by God, and
born of the Holy Spirit may (let God wish and strive ever so much to the
contrary) throw away all and perish eternally; and (3) Calvinism."
"Only two are held by Christians." That is Calvin's
position and Arminius' position."
Calvinists would like to make
people believe that if one does not teach universal salvation, he must
either be a Calvinist or an Arminian. And since the Arminian position does
such violence to the grace of God, many preferred to call themselves
Calvinists. But a person doesn't have to take either position.
I am neither Arminian nor
Calvinist. I believe in salvation by grace through faith in the finished
work of Christ. I believe in the eternal security of the believer. I believe
that Jesus Christ died for all men, and I believe what the Bible says, "That
whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."
But I disagree with all five points of Calvinism as John
Calvin taught it.
In conclusion, let me say that Calvin and those who
followed him claimed to believe and follow the Bible. They claimed to find
at least a germ of the Calvinist doctrine in the Scriptures. But a careful
student will find that again and again they go beyond Scripture, and that
Calvinism is a philosophy developed by man and depending on fallible logic
and frail, human reasoning, with the perversion of some Scriptures, the
misuse of others, and the total ignoring of many clear Scriptures. Calvin
did teach many wonderful, true doctrines of the Scripture.
It is true that God foreknows everything that will happen
in the world. It is true that God definitely ordained and determined some
events ahead of time and selected some individuals for His purposes. It is
certain that people are saved by grace, and are kept by the power of God.
That far Calvinists may well their doctrines by the Scriptures. But beyond
that, Calvinism goes into the realm of human philosophy.
It is not a Bible doctrine, but a
system of human philosophy, especially appealing to the scholarly intellect,
the self-sufficient and proud mind. Brilliant, philosophical, scholarly
preachers are apt to be misled on this matter more than the humble-hearted,
I have your letter which came recently, objecting to my
article, "Why I Disagree With All Five Points of Calvinism." In the second
paragraph of page 1, you say, "As to will. . . "Then you spend the next two
or three pages talking about will and calling attention to Bible verses. You
mention Titus 3:5 where the Bible says, " Not by works of righteousness
which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing
of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost."
I have just read this section of
your letter over several times, and you seem to confuse works with will. For
instance, you call attention to Isaiah 64:6 where the Bible says, " all our
righteousnesses are as filthy rags. " Trusting Christ for salvation is the
opposite of works. When a man believes that Jesus Christ died for him and
fully trusts Jesus to save him, and nothing else, then he's not working for
salvation. He's trusting Christ and what Christ did at Calvary.
But it is his own will that he trusts Christ. God doesn't
make anyone trust Him. In John 5:40 Jesus said, "Ye will not come to me,
that ye might have life." He did not say you cannot come; He said you will
You go on to say in this particular part of your letter,
"We are sinners from birth. . . as Adam, we hid ourselves from God."
It is true that Adam hid himself from God. But when God
came and called for Adam, Adam answered God of his own will and he came out
from his place of hiding of his own will. God did not take Adam by the hand
and drag him out of the place of hiding. He simply called and Adam came out.
Every man comes to God of his own will.
In Matthew 23:37 Jesus said, "O
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which
are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together,
even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!"
Still discussing the matter of will, you make reference
to Romans 5:12 and say that we are dead in sin. Then you continue, "Note a
dead person cannot move, respond, walk, nor anything."
Now, you have a misunderstanding of death. Death is not
annihilation. Death is not cessation of existence. Death is simply
separation. Physical death is the separation of the soul and spirit from the
body, and spiritual death is the separation of the man from God.
In the parable of the prodigal son, when the prodigal
returned home the father said, "This my son was dead, and is alive again."
The prodigal son was dead in the sense that he was separated from the
father. He was certainly capable of making decisions while he was in the far
country separated from the father. As a matter of fact, he made the decision
and went back to the father. Luke 15:18-20 says, "I will arise and go to my
father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and
before thee. And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of
thy hired servants. And he arose, and came to his father."
Now, here is a dead person who could move, respond, walk,
see his need, decide to do something about it, and go to the father. And
verse 24 says, "For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost,
and is found."
Your misunderstanding of death has
led you to build a false doctrine based on an illustration, instead of
Scripture. In Genesis 2:17 God said to Adam, "..for in the day that thou
eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." If you'll read the next few chapters
of Genesis, you will find that Adam did not die in the sense of ceasing to
exist when he partook of the forbidden fruit. As a matter of fact, Genesis
5:4 says, "And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight
hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters." According to this verse,
Adam lived eight hundred years after he begat Seth, and Seth was not
begotten until after Adam disobeyed God.
Now, was God wrong when He said to
Adam, "Thou shalt surely die"? No. Well, did Adam die? Yes, He died in the
sense that God drove him from His presence, and he was separated from God
because of his sins.
When the Bible says that men are dead in trespasses and
sins, that does not mean they cannot move, respond, walk, nor anything as
you said in your letter. Adam did a lot of moving and a lot of responding
and a lot of walking in the more than 800 years he lived after the fall.
So you see, when the Bible says
that "death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned," that "death" is
not to be compared with the body of a dead man lying in a casket. I might
say that what you see in the casket in the funeral home is really not the
man. The body that you're looking at is only the house in which the man
lived. The man who lived in that house is still alive. He's either with
Christ in Heaven, or he's in Hell, depending on whether or not he trusted
Christ as his Saviour. If he's in Heaven, he can certainly move, respond ,
and walk. And if he's in Hell, he can certainly move, respond, and walk.
I won't take the space to quote the many Bible verses
concerning the dead, but I suggest you read the story of the rich man in
Luke 16 and you will see that though he had died he could still talk and
make decisions. And if you'll read Revelation 6:9-11 and Luke 15: 7 and 10,
you will see that people who are in Heaven are conscious. You will see that
they rejoice. They talk. They know what's happening on earth, and they ask
questions of the Lord. So you're wrong when you compare the spiritually dead
state of a sinner with that of a body lying in a casket.
Further in your letter, you tell of a young girl who was
supposedly led wrong by what you call Baptist doctrine. You say she accepted
Christ, and now she is living immorally and impure.
Now, Mr.___________, I can only say
what the Bible says in Hebrews 12:8, "But if ye be without chastisement,
whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons." If the young
girl you mentioned has trusted Christ as Saviour, I can assure you that she
has everlasting life and she will be chastened. John 3:36 says, " He that
believeth on the Son hath everlasting life." Now that's a fact. It's not a
matter of what I think about it. It's a matter of what the Bible says. And
Hebrews 12:8 makes it clear that those who trusted Christ as Saviour will be
On page 5 you say, "Now as to perseverance..." and you
call attention to Revelation 3:5 and talk about overcoming. You imply that
this overcoming is some kind of perseverance or effort.
First John 5:4,5 says, "For
whosoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that
overcometh the world, even our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world,
but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?" Here the Bible says
plainly that the victory that overcometh the world is our faith. We overcome
the world by trusting Christ, not by persevering.
I made it plain in my article that I believe in eternal
security, but the saints are not secure because they persevere. They are
secure because they have been preserved. The word "perseverance" is defined
in Webster's Dictionary as "a persistent effort." "Preservation" is defined
as "the act of keeping or state of being kept from injury or decay."
The victory that overcomes the world is not your
perseverance. It is your faith, according to 1 John 5:4.
You close your letter with a P.S., "Note no human is born
of his own will but of the will of the parents. Christ says we are to be
Again, you make the mistake of using a human illustration
in order to build a Bible doctrine. You seem to make the same mistake that
Nicodemus made in John chapter 3. He tried to compare the spiritual birth to
the physical birth. In John 3:4 he said to Christ, " How can a man be born
when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be
You cannot compare the physical birth to the spiritual
birth. Jesus said in verse 6, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and
that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." They are two different things.
You will be better off if you will build Bible doctrine on what the Bible
says rather than on illustrations.
I hope this letter helps you to better understand my
position. I want you to re-read the sermon, "Why I Disagree With All Five
Points of Calvinism," carefully.
I'm glad you receive THE SWORD OF THE LORD, and I want
you to feel free to express your opinions about anything you find written in
Sincerely in Christ,
Sword of the Lord Publishers
Home Page -
Accept Jesus Now! -