[In Acts chapter two we have seen the glorious giving of the Holy Spirit
to the Church of our Lord Jesus Christ.
We have seen how the Holy Spirit moved in the Church to make them a
witness to all nations and to cause them to minister to one another in love.
Now we must consider carefully the miraculous gift of tongues that
accompanied the movement of the Holy Spirit within the early Church.
In addressing tongues we are dealing with one of the most widely
debated issues facing the contemporary Church.
Hence, we will work diligently to discover what the Bible reveals
about this incredible work of the Holy Spirit and how it applies to our
Church and Christians today.]
Of Tongues In The Bible We
Discover,
A.
The Purpose Of Tongues
1.
To Proclaim The Message (vs
4, 6, 8, 11) [-
And they were all filled with the Holy
Ghost,
and began to speak
with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. ]
[Acts 2:6
6 . . .
every man heard
them speak in his own
language. ]
[Acts 2:8
8 And
how hear we
every man
in our own tongue,
wherein we were born?]
[Acts 2:11
11 . . .
we do hear them
speak in our tongues
the wonderful works
of God. ]
[The Purpose of
Tongues or the miraculous speaking in unlearned languages is revealed
through the context of our passage.
This miraculous gift was given to aid the Church in fulfilling the
command of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Our Lord Commanded,]
[Acts 1:8
8
But ye shall receive power, after
that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both
in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part
of the earth. ]
[The gospel was
to be proclaimed in every nation to all people and on this Day of Pentecost
God reached out with the Gospel message as no one had ever reached out
before.]
[We note in our text that,]
·
[Every man heard, no one was excluded.
Likewise the salvation offered by our Lord Jesus Christ is to all
people.]
·
[Every Language was spoken.
These tongues were clear dialects, or languages.]
[Verse 11 of
our text gives us the clearest definition of the intent of these spoken
tongues or languages. It
states,]
[Acts 2:11
11
. . . we do hear them speak in our
tongues
the wonderful works
of God. ]
2.
To Promote Repentance (vs
37-38, 41) [– When the
Holy Spirit was given at Pentecost there was the sound of the rushing mighty
wind and the tongues of fire that descended upon the Church, but the people
outside of the room where the Church was located did not take notice of any
of those things. What grabbed
the attention of the crowd outside of the room where the Church was located?
It was the fact that the people of the Church began powerfully
witnessing of Christ and God in every man’s native language.
It was the speaking of these tongues that drew attention and grew a
large crowd for Peter to speak to that day. What was the end result of the
tongues and Peter’s preaching?]]
[Acts 2:37-38
37 Now when
they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and
to the rest of the apostles, Men
and brethren,
what shall we do?
38 Then
Peter said unto
them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ
for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
]
[Acts 2:41 41
Then they that
gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there
were added unto them about
three thousand souls. ]
[God’s Goal
in this New Testament Church Age is to bring the unbelieving to repentance
and the New Birth found only in the Lord Jesus Christ.]
3.
To Pierce Through Prejudices
(Acts 10.44-48; Acts 11.15-18; 1 Cor
14.21-22; Isa 28.11; Rom 11.11) [–
Throughout the New Testament, when
tongues are spoken it is used to confirm that the Holy Spirit had been given
to new believers. This does not
mean that tongues was spoken every time someone was saved and received the
Holy Spirit. But when critical
evidence was needed the Holy Spirit evidenced his presence.
At Pentecost the speaking of tongues evidenced the Holy Spirit
empowering the newly indwelt Church.
At Cornelius’ house tongues were spoken to confirm that the Holy
Spirit was given to the Gentiles .
The Bible reveals,]
[Acts 10:44-48
44 While Peter
yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision
which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on
the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46
For they heard
them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water,
that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as
well as we? 48 And he commanded
them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry
certain days. ]
[When the
Jewish Church Leaders doubted the conversion of these Gentiles the Bible
states,]
[Acts 11:1-4
1 And the
apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also
received the word of God. 2 And
when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision
contended with him, 3 Saying,
Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them.
4 But Peter rehearsed
the matter from the
beginning, and expounded it
by order unto them, saying, ]
[Acts 11:15-18
15 And as I
began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.
16 Then remembered I the word of the
Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be
baptized with the Holy Ghost. 17
Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as
he did unto us, who believed
on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?
18 When they heard these things, they
held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the
Gentiles granted repentance unto life.]
[This is a
dynamic and important purpose of New Testament Tongues.
Paul wrote,]
[1 Corinthians 14:21-22
21 In the law
it is written, With men of
other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all
that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.
22
Wherefore tongues
are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not:
. . . ]
[In 1
Corinthians 14.21 Paul is quoting,]
[Isaiah 28:11
11 For with
stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people. ]
[Why would God
speak to these Jews through tongues?
As an evidence that the Holy Spirit was given first to the Church at
Pentecost, then to the Samaritans, then to the Gentiles at Cornelius’ house?
The Bible says,]
[Romans 11:11
11 I say then,
Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but
rather through their fall
salvation is come unto the
Gentiles,
for to provoke them
to jealousy. ]
[So that the
Jews could never again say that Jehovah God belonged exclusively to the
Jews. God, through the
indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit had broken down the spiritual wall
that separated the Jew from all other people.
Through the sign gift of tongues (1 Cor 14.22) God undeniably
revealed that Salvation was given freely to all who would believe and
receive the Lord Jesus Christ.]
[This sign gift
of tongues would thereby stir up the Jews to Jealousy, as stated in Romans
11.11. Why?
Because that which was once their s exclusively was now opened up to
all races, every nation, and every ethnic group.
The Jewish people were no longer God’s exclusive people.]
[Hence, through the sign of tongues
God has broken down the source of the prejudices of the Jewish people.
When the Bible says,]
[1 Corinthians 14:21-22
21 In the law
it is written, With men of
other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all
that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.
22
Wherefore tongues
are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not:
. . . ]
[It means that
tongues is a sign to those Jews who, through their religious prejudices,
will try to deny that God will save and indwell those traditionally rejected
by the Jews; the Gentiles. It
would be the proud Jews who would refuse to believe that salvation was given
to all mankind, and that all through Christ now have open access to Jehovah
God. The Holy Spirit through the
sign of tongues removed this false belief.]
B.
The Problem With Tongues
[– Clearly in our day we understand that there are problems with the
contemporary tongues movement.
The tongues spoken in Churches in our day have become a source of division
within Christianity as a whole.
But are these problems new to the Church?
And are these problems addressed in the Bible?
The problems we face today have been around as long as the Church of
our Lord. We find them clearly
addressed in 1 Corinthians 14.
In our study we will diligently compare the
Tongues of Pentecost with the
Unknown Tongues of 1 Corinthians
14.]
[In order to
see the distinctive I am about to show you, you will need a King James
Bible; for only in the King James Bible will you find the unknown tongues
that I believe are essential to our understanding of biblical Tongues.
As you look at 1 Corinthians 14 you will find that in places the word
Unknown appears in italics before the word tongues.
The fact that the word unknown is in italics means that the word was
added by the translators for the sake of understanding, but the word was not
in the original text. You should
notice that
not every
occurrence of the word tongues in 1 Corinthians 14 has this word unknown
preceding it and this is equally significant.]
[Some scholars
would argue that this word unknown should not precede these occasions of the
word tongues, for they feel there is no distinction between these words.
However, when I consider that the translators of the King James Bible
were masters of the Biblical Greek language, because they memorized it all
their lives, and read it in Greek every day of their lives, for they had no
reliable English Bible in their day, I tend to trust their judgment more
than I do modern scholarship in Biblical Greek.
As one digs into these linguistic distinctions one discovers that
there are undeniable differences.]
[Spiros
Zodhiates notes,]
[One
observation only needs to be made.
In the three historical occurrences of speaking in tongues in Acts
2.4,6,8;10.46 and 19.6, these were dialects as specifically stated in Acts
2.6,8. or languages (heterai, 2087) other than the ones known by the
speakers. Also in Mk. 16.17; 1
Cor 12.10,28,30; 13.1,8; 14.5,6,18,22, when the word glossai is used
in the plural with a singular pronoun, reference is made to ethnic
languages. When the word
“tongue” is used in the singular, glossa as in 1 Cor
14.2,4,13,19,26,27, it refers to the Corinthian ecstatic utterance.
In 1Cor 14.9 it refers to the physical tongue of man, and in 1 Cor
14.23; being in the plural with a personal pronoun, it refers to the
Corinthian ecstatic utterances.[1]]
[While Spiros
Zodhiates represents the distinction between tongues and unknown tongues
well, He does not stand alone.
Many have noted these distinctions; notes at the end of this outline list
some of these supporting references and comments. ]
[To help us see
the distinctions between the two types of Tongues lets do a simple
comparison in the Bible. After
all, the Bible is the best commentary on the Bible.
|
Tongues
|
Unknown Tongues
|
|
Acts 2.4 – The Holy Spirit
Spoke through them
|
1 Cor 14.26 – Every man speaks
|
|
Acts 2.6,8 – The Bystanders Understood
|
1 Cor 14.2,13-14 – No man understands, not even the speaker.
|
|
Acts 2.6 – Those hearing
were unified
|
1 Cor 14.23 - Casued division.
The Church in Corinth was a divided church.
|
|
Acts 2.11 – God was glorified
|
1 Cor 14.26 – Edification is more important than tongues
|
|
Acts 2.14-36 – The gospel was preached
|
1 Cor 14.2 – A spiritual work between a man and God, but no earthly
understanding.
|
|
Acts 2.37-38 – Many were saved
|
1 Cor 14.33 – Unknown Tongues causes confusion.
|
|
1 Cor 14.18 – Paul Spoke with tongues
|
1 Cor 14.19 – Paul did not speak in unknown tongues.
|
|
1 Cor 14.23 – Tongues can be confusing
|
1 Cor 14.13 – Unknown tongues are confusing to the speaker.
|
|
1 Cor 14.5 – Paul encourage the speaking of tongues for edification.
|
1 Cor 14.27-28 – Paul, in essence, ruled out speaking in unknown
tongues
|
[It is clear to
me from this comparison that there is a distinct difference between the
tongues of Acts and the Unknown Tongues of 1 Corinthians 14.
I am convinced that the tongues we see in churches today are the
unknown tongues of 1 Corinthians 14 and, like Paul, I have no desire to
experience them because I agree with Paul that they will cause confusion and
division and benefit no one but those speaking in them.
Edification, understanding, and clarification are far more important
than any unknown, mystic, spiritual language that no one can really
understand.]
C.
The Period of Tongues (1 Cor
13.8-10) [– By the period
of tongues I mean the time frame of tongues and the end of the tongues of
the Apostles. Without any doubt
what occurred at Pentecost and at other times in the history of the New
Testament Church, as recorded in Acts, no longer occurs in our day.
Is God able to cause people to speak in languages they have never
learned? God is able to do
anything He desires to do.
However, our missionaries today spend years learning the languages of the
people groups they desire to serve.
We do not see the type of tongues spoken by the Apostle in our world
today. I believe that this is in
fulfillment of,]
[1 Corinthians 13:8-10
8 Charity
never faileth: but whether there be
prophecies, they shall fail; whether
there be tongues, they shall
cease; whether there be
knowledge, it shall vanish away. 9
For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
10 But when that which is perfect is
come, then that which is in part shall be done away.]
1.
A
Distinction In Gifts
[Notice some important word
distinctions in these verses,]
[Fail, Vanish Away (vs 8)
– Prophecies . . . shall fail;
Knowledge . . . shall vanish away –
καταργηθήσονται (gk) - from
katá
(2596), an intens., and
argéō (691), to be idle.
To render inactive, idle, useless, ineffective,
trans.[2] ]
[Cease (vs 8)
– Tongues . . . cease –
παύσονται (Gk) -
To stop, pause, make an end.
Used chiefly in the mid.
paúomai, meaning to come
to an end, take one’s rest, a willing cessation (Luke 5:4). . . .
used in an absolute sense, to cease, come to an end (Luke 8:24; Acts
20:1; 1 Cor. 13:8; Sept.: Ex. 9:33, 34).[3]
]
[There is a lot of debate about what
that which is perfect refers to.
I simply believe that this refers to the coming kingdom of God,
following the Rapture, and Tribulation Period when the perfect Kingdom of
God is set up. Then all
prophecy, or proclaiming of the Word of God, and knowledge will fade away.
Why? Because the Lord Jesus Christ is with mankind and mankind will
hear directly from Him.]
[However, the word cease used in conjunction with tongues denotes a
definite and distinct end. It is
not in the same category as prophecy and knowledge as a distinct word is
used. So when did tongues cease?
It ceased when the purpose for tongues ended.]
2.
A Definitive End
[Tongues, as we studied, was a sign used to provoke the Jews to jealousy
by revealing that the Gentiles were accepted by God as indicated by their
baptizing, and filling by the Holy Spirit.
In 70 AD Titus vanquished Jerusalem, dispersed the Jews, and
destroyed the temple. When the
temple was destroyed in essence Titus removed the Jews access to God.
They no longer had a holy of holies to meet God in, and therefore
Israel no longer had an exclusive claim to God.
Hence, there was no more need to try and convince the Jews that the
gentiles had been accepted by God.
If the Jews would come to God, there is now only one approach to God,
that is through the Lord Jesus Christ.]
CrossRoads
Baptist, Sunday Evening, Aug 08, 2010
Notes on Unknown Tongues:
From both these expressions must be carefully
distinguished the simple phrase
lale²n
glðssiav,
glðssiav
lale²n,
lale²n
glðssÛ,
glðssÛ
lale²n
(and proseÀcesqai
glðssÛ,
1 Co. xiv.14) to speak with (in) a tongue (the organ of speech, to speak
with tongues; this, as appears from 1 Co.xiv.7 sqq., is the gift of men who,
rapt in an ecstasy and no longer quite master of their own reason and
consciousness, pour forth their glowing spiritual emotions in strange
utterances, rugged, dark, disconnected, quite unfitted to instruct or
influence the mind of others: Acts x.46; xix.6; 1 Co. xii.30; xiii.1;
xiv.2,4-6,18,23,27,39.[4]
A special problem is posed by the t.t.
glòssai, g™vh
glwssòÛ
(-aiv)
lale²n
1 Cor 14:1-27,39;12:10,28,30;13:1,8;Ac 10:22; 19:6.
Always without the article (in 1 Cor 14:22
a³ is anaphronic;
vs. 9 belongs under mng. 1a). There is no doubt about the thing referred to,
namely the broken speech of persons in religious ecstasy.[5]
In this inspired utterance the
noÂv
is swallowed up (14:14,19), so that the mysterious words, obscure
both to the speaker and to the hearers, are spoken in a void (14:2,911,15
f.). There is an unarticulated
sound as of an instrument played with no clear differentiation of notes
(14:7 f.). . . . In Corinth, therefore, glossolalia is an unintelligible
ecstatic utterance. One of its
forms of expression is a muttering of words or sounds without
interconnection or meaning.[6]
Leon Morris in commenting on 1 Corinthians 14.2 writes,
“No man understandeth him makes it plain that the gift spoken of here is
different from that in Acts ii, where all men understood.”[7]
Bringing to light the tendency for many to view the tongues spoken of
in Acts as a different type of tongues than that spoken of in 1 Corinthians
14. It appears that the
intelligibility of the tongue spoken is the main reason for the
differentiation between the various accounts.
Wayne Grudem takes another approach to the study of the
distinctive types of tongues found in the Bible.
He studies the plain literary context of the most controversial
passages in this debate. He
notes that in Acts chapter two we see the disciples speaking in tongues at
Pentecost and those present from varying countries heard them speaking in
their own languages, and specifically notes that the passage states these
languages were unknown to those speaking in them.
Grudem then compares the occurrence recorded in Acts chapter two to
Paul’s discourse concerning tongues in First Corinthians fourteen.
Grudem stresses that the fact that tongues were spoken in a known
language in the acts passage does not indicate that this is always so, for
Paul is clear when he says that “no one” will understand the one speaking in
tongues (1 Cor. 14:2,16). Grudem
writes, “Sometimes this gift may result in speaking in a human language that
the speaker has not learned, but ordinarily it seems that it will involve
speech in a language that no one understands, whether that be a human
language or not.”[8]
Hence, the distinction between the tongues recorded in Acts and the
tongues recorded in 1 Corinthians 14.